612-466-0010
2812 Anthony Ln S, Suite 200
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418

Age Discrimination Settlement Agreements

Employers who are terminating the employment of older employees often enter into settlement agreements with these employees in which the employer provides benefits to the employee in return for the employee’s release of his or her claims against the employer. The release usually focuses on waiving rights that the employee may otherwise have to bring claims of age discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act or the ADEA. Such releases will usually be upheld if the agreement contains specific language notifying the employee of his or her 15-day right of rescission under the Minnesota Human Rights Act and/or the 7-day right of rescission under the ADEA, as applicable.249

Under the ADEA, the employer must provide the employee with at least 21 days to consider an individual agreement and to consult with legal counsel before signing the agreement, and another seven days to rescind the agreement after having signed it. The employer may revoke its settlement offer during the 21 day review period before the employee accepts. If the waiver is requested in connection with an exit incentive program such as an early retirement program discussed in the previous section, the employer is subject to additional specific notice requirements and the 21 day review period for the employee is increased to 45 days. Be aware that when an employer requests waivers from two or more employees, it may be considered an exit incentive type program under the ADEA and that additional information must be included in the release document in order for it to be enforceable.

Settlement Agreement Enforceability

To be enforceable, an agreement which contains a release of age claims in exchange for benefits must describe in clear and understandable language the time periods for review and rescission, the specific rights that the employee is waiving, advice as to the employee’s right to consult with an attorney and the fact that the agreement does not waive rights of the employee which arise after the agreement is signed.250 These requirements are strictly interpreted and the EEOC from time to time issues regulations and Guidance documents describing its view on the requirements of a knowing and voluntary waiver of ADEA claims. In fact, a release of age discrimination claims that does not satisfy all of the statutory requirements is not an effective waiver of claims and does not prevent the assertion of an ADEA claim even if the employee signs the waiver and release agreement it and keeps the money or other consideration offered in connection with the release of claims.251 Therefore, these (as well as all other) release agreements should be implemented only with the advice of legal counsel.

Also, there must be no hint of coercion or undue pressure on the employee. The amount of consideration (benefits) provided generally depends upon the employee’s salary, the length of employment and other like factors.


249. Minn. Stat. § 363A.31 (2007).
250. Older Workers Benefit Protection Act § 201, 29 U.S.C. § 626(f)(1) (2007).

{ 0 comments }

I sometimes receive questions regarding what rights, if any, grandparents have with respect to visitation with their grandchild.  For example, when a parent dies, some grandparents worry that they will not have an opportunity to establish a meaningful relationship (or any relationship at all) with their grandchild because their surviving son-in-law or daughter-in-law may prevent them from seeing their grandchild. In these cases, grandparents are entitled to ask the court to grant them reasonable visitation to their grandchild.

In order to be awarded visitation, the court must find that the visitation would be in the best interests of the child and that it would not interfere with the parent-child relationship.  In making this determination, the court must consider the amount of personal contact between the grandparents and the child that occurred prior to the grandparents seeking relief from the court.

Additionally, regardless of whether a parent of a child is deceased, grandparents may also have visitation rights: (i) when the parents of their grandchild get divorced; (ii)  during or after a custody proceeding (in the case of unmarried parents); or (iii) when their grandchild has resided with them for twelve months or more and is subsequently removed from the residence by a parent.  In these cases, the standard is the same: the court must find that the visitation would be in the best interests of the child and that it would not interfere with the parent-child relationship.

Regardless of the circumstances, being able to spend time with their grandchild is very important to many grandparents.  In situations where grandparents fear that they may not be allowed to spend time with their grandchild, it is important to have an advocate who understands the law and can present a strong case to the judge.

{ 0 comments }

Violations of Parenting Time Provisions in an Existing Court Order

February 6, 2012

In my experience, once a court order addressing custody and parenting time is in place, it seems that it is only a matter of time [...]

Read the full article →

Early Retirement in Minnesota

February 6, 2012

Early Retirement Programs Employers who are planning to reduce their workforce may legally institute early retirement programs which offer incentives to certain groups of employees [...]

Read the full article →

Age Discrimination in Minnesota | Minneapolis Age Discrimination Attorney

February 5, 2012

Minnesota Law Minnesota law protects individuals who have attained the age of majority (18) from discrimination in the workplace based on age. Federal law, the [...]

Read the full article →

Minnesota Disability Discrimination

February 4, 2012

MN Law — Minnesota Human Rights Act Under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (which generally applies to employers with one or more employees), individuals with [...]

Read the full article →

Permitted Employment Practices

February 3, 2012

The following employment practices, which could otherwise be construed as discriminatory, are legally permissible:227 An employer may refuse to hire an individual for a reason [...]

Read the full article →

Divorce: What Are My Rights Before It Is Final?

February 3, 2012

Many people wonder what laws or rules govern the relationship between the parties once a divorce action is commenced by service of the Summons and [...]

Read the full article →

Felony Level Offense Sentencing in Minnesota

February 2, 2012

A Hypothetical: A person we will call “Jane” has been found guilty of felony level welfare fraud. The amount stolen equals $50,000. She has no [...]

Read the full article →

Miscellaneous Issues Surrounding Domestic Abuse in Minnesota

February 1, 2012

Insurance practices It is an unfair method of competition and an unfair and deceptive act or practice to refuse to offer, sell, or renew coverage, [...]

Read the full article →






By clicking SEND you accept the Terms of Use 612-466-0010
× Close

Did you find this page helpful? If so, please rate us on Avvo or Google.